MTB by 198 RSS Feed   

Maxxis Ardent - Mounted

Maxxis Ardent - Mounted

Thanks for visiting! If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. This blog posts regular product reviews, industry news, riding tips, videos, ride reports and anything else mountain biking. Go ahead, subscribe to our feed! You can also receive updates from this blog via email.

I finally got a chance to take a really good look at the Maxxis Ardents...mounted, weighed and measured.

  • Bike:  Ventana El Terremoto 6.0
  • Front Wheel:  Chris King 20mm Hub with DT Swiss 5.1d Rim (27.8mm wide)
  • Rear Wheel:  Chris King HD Fun Bolt with Mavic EX 823 (30mm wide)
  • Front Fork:  Rock Shox Lyrik Coil U-Turn 115-160mm
  • Front Tire:  Maxxis Ardent 2.6 DH 3c
  • Rear Tire:  Maxxis Ardent 2.4 DH 60a

Note:  Results will vary depending on tire and rim.

MAXXIS ARDENT INITIAL IMPRESSIONS

They are relatively light for DH tires.  Both the 2.6 and 2.4 weighed in at 2 lbs 14 oz (roughly 1304g) which really isn't that bad for tires this large with thick DH casings.  After the weigh in, I removed the Maxxis 2.35 High Roller UST's and mounted up the Ardents.  The Ardents went on much easier than the High Rollers they replaced.  I didn't even need to use tire levers.  In comparison to the High Rollers, the Ardents are much larger with a lot more volume.  This is a welcomed change because the "claimed" 2.35 High Rollers really only measured out to about 2.2 and the volume was much less than the other 2.35's on the market.  It appears that Maxxis is really making an effort on claimed vs. actual specs this year.

HOW DO THEY MEASURE UP?

Measurement Specs (pictures below):

  • Front 2.6 Casing Width:  2.210 in. @ 28 psi
  • Front 2.6 Tread Width:  2.522 in. @ 28 psi
  • Rear 2.4 Casing Width:  2.175 in. @ 28 psi
  • Rear 2.4 Tread Width:  2.317 in. @ 28 psi

Now, these measurements will vary slightly depending on rim choice.  My 2.6 is measuring out smaller on the 5.1d (27.8mm wide) than it would on an 823 (30mm wide).  The rear 2.4 width on the 823 is pretty close to what you should find on most DH rims.  The full labeled production versions should be very close to this set.

198'S THOUGHTS

So far, these tires look great.  The tread pattern is the best that I have seen out of the Maxxis camp so far, and I am really hoping that they rail the corners with lower rolling resistance than the High Rollers or Minions.  I will be taking the bike to the Big Creek freeride area to check their rock garden and drop performance and then a couple of laps around the cross country course for some overall performance testing.  These tires have increased my patience line on the UST Big Betty's that were supposed to be in our hands Jan. '08.  I am starting to think Schwalbe meant Jan. '09.  Stay tuned for full ride reports and final thoughts.

Side note: For those of you with Lyrik's or Terremoto's, I included stay and fork clearance pictures.

If you like this post then please consider commenting below and subscribing to my full feed RSS. You can also subscribe by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox. You can also follow me on Twitter.


 Powered by Max Banner Ads 
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Related Posts

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed! You can also subscribe by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox. When you feel bored, follow me on Twitter.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This post was written by:

198 - who has written 199 posts on Mountain Biking by 198.

My name is Robb Sutton (aka.198)...the owner of MTB by 198. I have been involved with the sport ever since my first real mountain bike that I received as a Christmas present in 1995. Ever since then, I have been hooked (ok...obsessed) with the sport and the lifestyle. I started Mountain Biking by 198 as another outlet for my passion for the sport, but also as a way to capture its progression over time.

Contact the author

4 Comments For This Post

  1. Erik Says:

    Dude, dont be a wuss…go for 40 lbs!

  2. Brian Says:

    Rapala scales are a joke. The tire casing size you measured depends on the PSI as well which wasn’t mentioned? Why a 3c rear and a 60a front? Seems like it should be reversed?

  3. 198 Says:

    @Brian:
    I agree on the scale, but it was the only one I could get a hold of at the time. I will have an Ultimate shortly to get more accurate results.
    Edited to include PSI.
    It is…typo on my part. Thanks for catching it.

  4. ta Says:

    Those tires look massive! But I like the look and sound of them real volume tires again would be nice, look forward to the full ride report RS..

    40lbs Eric he might as well go for the EL Cuervo! LOL.

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Maxxis Ardent 2.6 3C and 2.4 60A - Tested | Mountain Biking by 198 Says:

    [...] Maxxis Ardents Mounted [...]

Leave a Reply